Hi,
You already got the reply to your question so feel free to ignore this.
On 01/10/2011 10:05 PM, Narendra Sisodiya wrote:
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 9:33 PM, Venkatraman S<venka...@gmail.com> wrote:
[...snip...]
My experience in this community -- "You 90% sucks 90%"
I do not understand what that meant ^^^. Are you trying to say this community is
hostile ?
* Yup I made mistake by replying bottom posting but that's ok. If you Google
search on my name ....blah blah blah [...snip...]....infact I keep
on instructing others So its better not to give lecture on everybody..
It doesn't matter who you are and what you've done before if you've committed a
mistake. The gracious thing to do when someone points out your mistake is to
accept it an apologize. If that is too much effort, just don't say anything and
move on, being careful not to do commit the mistake again.
* May of you were kinds enough that you started explaining me fundas of
License Copyright and other things. Who the hell asked about all this.
You did AFAICT:
http://mail.python.org/pipermail/bangpypers/2011-January/005610.html
quoting:
That's exactly I want to understand. Let take a fictitious example
[...snip...]
I want to understand the benefit/advantage of buying commercial license for
PyQT.
In fact, afaict from your responses of coming up with imaginative fairy-tale
scenarios where your code spits out valid PyQt which your users then may use
after downloading GPL'd PyQt (did I get that right ?) I might even say you are
trolling.
I will ask my query on company's email id and will forward to this mailing
list but I would to say again... Please always reply what somebody is
asking.. Even though you are trying to help by reply but actually you
discourage and irritate people..
I did not see one thing that would be perceived as discouraging or irritating to
anyone who does not have a egoistical
'you-don't-know-who-I-am-and-what-I've-done-and-I-don't-need-you-to-explain-me-stuff-I-already-know'
attitude. Please take a deep breath and re-read the responses. They were all
polite (maybe tongue-in-cheek; I don't remember, but polite nonetheless).
A lot of time, a lot of people (me included) just reply to content, without even
bothering to check the name of the sender. So, if they include something that
you already know about, it is not out of condescension but just because of the
programmer trait of being complete as well as concise.
hth,
cheers,
- steve
--
random spiel: http://lonetwin.net/
what i'm stumbling into: http://lonetwin.stumbleupon.com/
_______________________________________________
BangPypers mailing list
BangPypers@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/bangpypers
