On 06/28/11 10:00, Jason A. Kates wrote:
> I also very much question the idea of this.
>
> I would suggest that it's best to not run bacula over this link but
> instead rsync the data to a local server and then just backup the
> location where the data was rsynced too. The bigger issue will be
> restores over a 1mb/s link....
That's actually more or less workable for small restores. The majority
of restores are just "Oh, hey, I need these three files restored from
four days ago." Full filesystem restores are relatively uncommon.
--
Phil Stracchino, CDK#2 DoD#299792458 ICBM: 43.5607, -71.355
ala...@caerllewys.net ala...@metrocast.net p...@co.ordinate.org
Renaissance Man, Unix ronin, Perl hacker, SQL wrangler, Free Stater
It's not the years, it's the mileage.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
All of the data generated in your IT infrastructure is seriously valuable.
Why? It contains a definitive record of application performance, security
threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes
sense of it. IT sense. And common sense.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2d-c2
_______________________________________________
Bacula-devel mailing list
Bacula-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-devel
