On 06/28/11 08:40, John Drescher wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 8:27 AM, Phil Stracchino <ala...@metrocast.net> wrote:
>> Adding a data limit to a Bacula job really won't do a lot to work around
>> the unreliability of the link, it'll just make the job terminate early
>> if you COULD have completed it in one shot. I'm not sure this idea
>> makes sense.
>>
>
> I think the idea is to terminate early without error. So that the next
> incremental ... can pickup where the full left off.
Oh, I totally get that, yes. I just think it's the wrong way to solve
the problem. It's a Band-Aid approach.
The better way to solve the problem would be to come up with some kind
of resume-job-from-checkpoint functionality, but that of course would be
a fairly major project.
--
Phil Stracchino, CDK#2 DoD#299792458 ICBM: 43.5607, -71.355
ala...@caerllewys.net ala...@metrocast.net p...@co.ordinate.org
Renaissance Man, Unix ronin, Perl hacker, SQL wrangler, Free Stater
It's not the years, it's the mileage.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
All of the data generated in your IT infrastructure is seriously valuable.
Why? It contains a definitive record of application performance, security
threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes
sense of it. IT sense. And common sense.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2d-c2
_______________________________________________
Bacula-devel mailing list
Bacula-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-devel
