Akim Demaille writes: > I know what you are going to say: we don't need autoheader, we should > just spit a cleaned up version of confdefs.h, as your patch does. But > I don't share this opinion, so yes, it is important to run autoheader. Just for my enlightenment: Why is it actually important to run autoheader before configure, rather than just having configure do that job? -- Peter Eisentraut Sernanders väg 10:115 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 75262 Uppsala http://yi.org/peter-e/ Sweden
- Re: AC_DEFINE-descriptions with 2.14* Thomas E. Dickey
- Re: AC_DEFINE-descriptions with 2.14* Akim Demaille
- Re: AC_DEFINE-descriptions with 2.14* Johan Danielsson
- Re: AC_DEFINE-descriptions with 2.14* Thomas E. Dickey
- Re: AC_DEFINE-descriptions with 2.14* Akim Demaille
- Re: AC_DEFINE-descriptions with 2.14* Thomas E. Dickey
- Re: AC_DEFINE-descriptions with 2.14* Akim Demaille
- Re: AC_DEFINE-descriptions with 2.14* Thomas E. Dickey
- Re: AC_DEFINE-descriptions with 2.14* Thomas Dickey
- Re: AC_DEFINE-descriptions with 2.14* Akim Demaille
- Re: AC_DEFINE-descriptions with 2.14* Peter Eisentraut
- Re: AC_DEFINE-descriptions with 2.14* Akim Demaille
- Re: AC_DEFINE-descriptions with 2.14* Alexandre Oliva
- Re: AC_DEFINE-descriptions with 2.14* Akim Demaille