On 17 Jul 2000, Akim Demaille wrote: > > | > Maybe AC_DEFINE(`echo FOO`) used to be understood by autoheader, but > | > it was a misfeature. In the general case, this cannot be done, > | > hence it must never work :) > | > | AC_DEFINE_UNQUOTED(`echo FOO`). Why can't it work? What happened in > | 2.13 was that you ended up with > | > | cat << END > | #undef `echo FOO` > | END > > :) This is what I call not to work properly :) Try with your $x for > instance. It would work only for trivial examples. ...such as this one. (it's a legal here-document, in case you hadn't noticed) -- T.E.Dickey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://dickey.his.com ftp://dickey.his.com
- AC_DEFINE-descriptions with 2.14* Johan Danielsson
- Re: AC_DEFINE-descriptions with 2.14* Johan Danielsson
- Re: AC_DEFINE-descriptions with 2.14* Akim Demaille
- Re: AC_DEFINE-descriptions with 2.14* Johan Danielsson
- Re: AC_DEFINE-descriptions with 2.14* Akim Demaille
- Re: AC_DEFINE-descriptions with 2.1... Johan Danielsson
- Re: AC_DEFINE-descriptions with... Akim Demaille
- Re: AC_DEFINE-descriptions ... Thomas E. Dickey
- Re: AC_DEFINE-descriptions ... Akim Demaille
- Re: AC_DEFINE-descriptions ... Johan Danielsson
- Re: AC_DEFINE-descriptions ... Thomas E. Dickey
- Re: AC_DEFINE-descriptions ... Akim Demaille
- Re: AC_DEFINE-descriptions with 2.1... Thomas E. Dickey
- Re: AC_DEFINE-descriptions with... Akim Demaille
- Re: AC_DEFINE-descriptions ... Thomas E. Dickey
- Re: AC_DEFINE-descriptions ... Thomas Dickey
- Re: AC_DEFINE-descriptions ... Akim Demaille
- Re: AC_DEFINE-descriptions ... Peter Eisentraut