Re: AC_DEFINE-descriptions with 2.14*

[Akim Demaille]

>>>>> "Thomas" == Thomas Dickey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

Thomas> On Mon, Jul 17, 2000 at 08:15:17PM +0200, Akim Demaille wrote:
>> : I missed this thread: what is your counter-example?
>> 
>> I know what you are going to say: we don't need autoheader, we
>> should just spit a cleaned up version of confdefs.h, as your patch
>> does.  But I don't share this opinion, so yes, it is important to
>> run autoheader.

Thomas> I don't need to repeat that opinion - you have yet to
Thomas> demonstrate that you have an equally good alternative.

I need to see a *real* problem we can't solve in order to do that.