Re: AC_DEFINE-descriptions with 2.14*

[Thomas Dickey]

On Mon, Jul 17, 2000 at 08:15:17PM +0200, Akim Demaille wrote:
> : I missed this thread: what is your counter-example?
> 
> I know what you are going to say: we don't need autoheader, we should
> just spit a cleaned up version of confdefs.h, as your patch does.  But
> I don't share this opinion, so yes, it is important to run autoheader.

I don't need to repeat that opinion - you have yet to demonstrate that
you have an equally good alternative.

-- 
Thomas E. Dickey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://dickey.his.com
ftp://dickey.his.com