Olly> What exactly do you have in mind here? Are you thinking of a macro to Olly> specify a level or perhaps better a list of requirements, maybe along Olly> the lines of: Olly> AC_SET_CXX_REQUIREMENTS(templates libstdc++) Olly> AC_PROG_CXX Olly> Or something where the user actually passes in a test program: Olly> AC_SET_CXX_TEST([int main() {return 0;}]) Olly> AC_PROG_CXX You can do both, by providing macros to build up a test based on requirements: AC_CXX_SET_TEST(AC_CXX_TEST_REQUIREMENTS(templates libstdc++)) You want to have generality because some people might need to test for something not covered by a standard test. (Of course another way to do this is to make the requirements mechanism extensible, which is probably also a good idea.) Tom
- Re: How to optionally test for a C++ compiler? Morten Eriksen
- Re: How to optionally test for a C++ compiler? Alexandre Oliva
- Re: How to optionally test for a C++ compiler? Ossama Othman
- Re: How to optionally test for a C++ compiler? Alexandre Oliva
- Re: How to optionally test for a C++ compiler... Ossama Othman
- Re: How to optionally test for a C++ comp... Alexandre Oliva
- Re: How to optionally test for a C++... Ossama Othman
- Re: How to optionally test for a C++ compiler? Alexandre Oliva
- Re: How to optionally test for a C++ compiler? Akim Demaille
- Re: How to optionally test for a C++ compiler? Olly Betts
- Re: How to optionally test for a C++ compiler? Akim Demaille
- Re: How to optionally test for a C++ compiler... Olly Betts
- Re: How to optionally test for a C++ comp... Akim Demaille