Hi Alexandre, On Tue, Feb 15, 2000 at 02:54:21PM -0200, Alexandre Oliva wrote: > On Feb 15, 2000, Ossama Othman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Right, but I think I'm missing something. Are you saying we should > > use __cplusplus in the AC_PROG_CXX test program? > > Well, that could make it for a very simple test. But then, it would > probably only involve the preprocessor. And there might be C++ > compilers that do not define __cplusplus. > > Let's use the test you (?) had suggested, at least as a default test. Yep, that was me. -Ossama -- Ossama Othman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Distributed Object Computing Laboratory, Univ. of California at Irvine 1024D/F7A394A8 - 84ED AA0B 1203 99E4 1068 70E6 5EB7 5E71 F7A3 94A8
- Re: How to optionally test for a C++ compiler? Ossama Othman
- Re: How to optionally test for a C++ compiler? Olly Betts
- Re: How to optionally test for a C++ compiler? Ossama Othman
- Re: How to optionally test for a C++ compiler? Morten Eriksen
- Re: How to optionally test for a C++ compiler? Alexandre Oliva
- Re: How to optionally test for a C++ compiler? Ossama Othman
- Re: How to optionally test for a C++ compiler? Alexandre Oliva
- Re: How to optionally test for a C++ compiler... Ossama Othman
- Re: How to optionally test for a C++ comp... Alexandre Oliva
- Re: How to optionally test for a C++... Ossama Othman
- Re: How to optionally test for a C++ compiler? Alexandre Oliva
- Re: How to optionally test for a C++ compiler? Akim Demaille
- Re: How to optionally test for a C++ compiler? Olly Betts
- Re: How to optionally test for a C++ compiler? Akim Demaille
- Re: How to optionally test for a C++ compiler... Olly Betts
- Re: How to optionally test for a C++ comp... Akim Demaille