Re: How to optionally test for a C++ compiler?

[Alexandre Oliva]

On Feb 12, 2000, Ossama Othman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> I think it's bad idea to check for bool and/or if __cplusplus is
> defined since some C compilers may actually accept them.

I can believe `bool' could be supported by C compilers, but defining
__cplusplus to non-zero would be cheating too much.  Do you have any
example of such a cheating compiler?

-- 
Alexandre Oliva     http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/     Enjoy Guaranį
Cygnus Solutions, a Red Hat company        aoliva@{redhat, cygnus}.com
Free Software Developer and Evangelist    CS PhD student at IC-Unicamp
oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}   Write to mailing lists, not to me