On Feb 15, 2000, Ossama Othman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Right, but I think I'm missing something. Are you saying we should > use __cplusplus in the AC_PROG_CXX test program? Well, that could make it for a very simple test. But then, it would probably only involve the preprocessor. And there might be C++ compilers that do not define __cplusplus. Let's use the test you (?) had suggested, at least as a default test. -- Alexandre Oliva http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/ Enjoy Guaranį Cygnus Solutions, a Red Hat company aoliva@{redhat, cygnus}.com Free Software Developer and Evangelist CS PhD student at IC-Unicamp oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org} Write to mailing lists, not to me
- Re: How to optionally test for a C++ compiler? Olly Betts
- Re: How to optionally test for a C++ compiler? Ossama Othman
- Re: How to optionally test for a C++ compiler? Olly Betts
- Re: How to optionally test for a C++ compiler? Ossama Othman
- Re: How to optionally test for a C++ compiler? Morten Eriksen
- Re: How to optionally test for a C++ compiler? Alexandre Oliva
- Re: How to optionally test for a C++ compiler? Ossama Othman
- Re: How to optionally test for a C++ compiler? Alexandre Oliva
- Re: How to optionally test for a C++ compiler... Ossama Othman
- Re: How to optionally test for a C++ comp... Alexandre Oliva
- Re: How to optionally test for a C++... Ossama Othman
- Re: How to optionally test for a C++ compiler? Alexandre Oliva
- Re: How to optionally test for a C++ compiler? Akim Demaille
- Re: How to optionally test for a C++ compiler? Olly Betts
- Re: How to optionally test for a C++ compiler? Akim Demaille
- Re: How to optionally test for a C++ compiler... Olly Betts
- Re: How to optionally test for a C++ comp... Akim Demaille