Alice,

The final edits look fine.

Albert should acknowledge hopefully shortly.

-- Jeff


On 4/3/25, 16:16, "Alice Russo" <aru...@staff.rfc-editor.org 
<mailto:aru...@staff.rfc-editor.org>> wrote:


[External Email. Be cautious of content]




Jeff,


Thank you for your reply. The revised files are here (please refresh):
https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9764.html__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!FzaeaQWcKusjfl28vMTSN9JwSaLG5fArOi_gKOPeNnRBbfi0qTJ5zDmgWYDrifkqYNR6EtIocw4PQXx8rXN0ye4$
 
<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9764.html__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!FzaeaQWcKusjfl28vMTSN9JwSaLG5fArOi_gKOPeNnRBbfi0qTJ5zDmgWYDrifkqYNR6EtIocw4PQXx8rXN0ye4$>
https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9764.txt__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!FzaeaQWcKusjfl28vMTSN9JwSaLG5fArOi_gKOPeNnRBbfi0qTJ5zDmgWYDrifkqYNR6EtIocw4PQXx8ld74nYQ$
 
<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9764.txt__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!FzaeaQWcKusjfl28vMTSN9JwSaLG5fArOi_gKOPeNnRBbfi0qTJ5zDmgWYDrifkqYNR6EtIocw4PQXx8ld74nYQ$>
https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9764.pdf__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!FzaeaQWcKusjfl28vMTSN9JwSaLG5fArOi_gKOPeNnRBbfi0qTJ5zDmgWYDrifkqYNR6EtIocw4PQXx8UWzdF5Q$
 
<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9764.pdf__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!FzaeaQWcKusjfl28vMTSN9JwSaLG5fArOi_gKOPeNnRBbfi0qTJ5zDmgWYDrifkqYNR6EtIocw4PQXx8UWzdF5Q$>
https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9764.xml__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!FzaeaQWcKusjfl28vMTSN9JwSaLG5fArOi_gKOPeNnRBbfi0qTJ5zDmgWYDrifkqYNR6EtIocw4PQXx8arNm9m8$
 
<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9764.xml__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!FzaeaQWcKusjfl28vMTSN9JwSaLG5fArOi_gKOPeNnRBbfi0qTJ5zDmgWYDrifkqYNR6EtIocw4PQXx8arNm9m8$>


This diff file shows all changes from the approved I-D:
https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9764-diff.html__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!FzaeaQWcKusjfl28vMTSN9JwSaLG5fArOi_gKOPeNnRBbfi0qTJ5zDmgWYDrifkqYNR6EtIocw4PQXx89x3-o34$
 
<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9764-diff.html__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!FzaeaQWcKusjfl28vMTSN9JwSaLG5fArOi_gKOPeNnRBbfi0qTJ5zDmgWYDrifkqYNR6EtIocw4PQXx89x3-o34$>
https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9764-rfcdiff.html__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!FzaeaQWcKusjfl28vMTSN9JwSaLG5fArOi_gKOPeNnRBbfi0qTJ5zDmgWYDrifkqYNR6EtIocw4PQXx89cQdl4I$
 
<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9764-rfcdiff.html__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!FzaeaQWcKusjfl28vMTSN9JwSaLG5fArOi_gKOPeNnRBbfi0qTJ5zDmgWYDrifkqYNR6EtIocw4PQXx89cQdl4I$>
 (side by side)


This diff file shows the changes made during AUTH48 thus far:
https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9764-auth48diff.html__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!FzaeaQWcKusjfl28vMTSN9JwSaLG5fArOi_gKOPeNnRBbfi0qTJ5zDmgWYDrifkqYNR6EtIocw4PQXx8sPrGfhQ$
 
<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9764-auth48diff.html__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!FzaeaQWcKusjfl28vMTSN9JwSaLG5fArOi_gKOPeNnRBbfi0qTJ5zDmgWYDrifkqYNR6EtIocw4PQXx8sPrGfhQ$>
https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9764-auth48rfcdiff.html__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!FzaeaQWcKusjfl28vMTSN9JwSaLG5fArOi_gKOPeNnRBbfi0qTJ5zDmgWYDrifkqYNR6EtIocw4PQXx8vkLb_s0$
 
<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9764-auth48rfcdiff.html__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!FzaeaQWcKusjfl28vMTSN9JwSaLG5fArOi_gKOPeNnRBbfi0qTJ5zDmgWYDrifkqYNR6EtIocw4PQXx8vkLb_s0$>
 (side by side)


This diff file shows only the changes since the last posted version:
https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9764-lastrfcdiff.html__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!FzaeaQWcKusjfl28vMTSN9JwSaLG5fArOi_gKOPeNnRBbfi0qTJ5zDmgWYDrifkqYNR6EtIocw4PQXx8lVSg7FA$
 
<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9764-lastrfcdiff.html__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!FzaeaQWcKusjfl28vMTSN9JwSaLG5fArOi_gKOPeNnRBbfi0qTJ5zDmgWYDrifkqYNR6EtIocw4PQXx8lVSg7FA$>


We will wait to hear from you again and from your coauthors
before continuing the publication process. This page shows
the AUTH48 status of your document:
https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9764__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!FzaeaQWcKusjfl28vMTSN9JwSaLG5fArOi_gKOPeNnRBbfi0qTJ5zDmgWYDrifkqYNR6EtIocw4PQXx8iBjY93c$
 
<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9764__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!FzaeaQWcKusjfl28vMTSN9JwSaLG5fArOi_gKOPeNnRBbfi0qTJ5zDmgWYDrifkqYNR6EtIocw4PQXx8iBjY93c$>


Thank you.
RFC Editor/ar



Juniper Business Use Only
> On Apr 3, 2025, at 6:25 AM, Jeff Haas <jh...@juniper.net 
> <mailto:jh...@juniper.net>> wrote:
>
> Alice,
>
>> This diff file shows the changes made during AUTH48 thus far:
>> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9764-auth48diff.html__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!DulRqW5N_GWlzu33Fmtfm45VVwyWnf--B3I530cGoqDy5GC_m8mpNAUqw53KwGOTWAkA2hX2Fe29g63r7I_AK7Y$
>>  
>> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9764-auth48diff.html__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!DulRqW5N_GWlzu33Fmtfm45VVwyWnf--B3I530cGoqDy5GC_m8mpNAUqw53KwGOTWAkA2hX2Fe29g63r7I_AK7Y$>
>>  
>> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9764-auth48diff.html__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!DulRqW5N_GWlzu33Fmtfm45VVwyWnf--B3I530cGoqDy5GC_m8mpNAUqw53KwGOTWAkA2hX2Fe29g63r7I_AK7Y$
>>  
>> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9764-auth48diff.html__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!DulRqW5N_GWlzu33Fmtfm45VVwyWnf--B3I530cGoqDy5GC_m8mpNAUqw53KwGOTWAkA2hX2Fe29g63r7I_AK7Y$>>
>
> The interdiff here looks fine, thanks.
>
>> Re: 4) Section 4.5, where "The above text" refers to the entire section, per 
>> your reply. This sentence has not been been updated. Please consider whether 
>> it would be more precise as follows.
>>
>> Orig: The above text also applies to most, if not all, BFD techniques.
>> Perhaps: This section applies to most, if not all, BFD techniques.
>
> The perhaps text is fine.
>
>> Re: 7) Security Considerations, you replied:
>>> The deviation was intentional, but perhaps may be better served by 
>>> preserving
>>> the original boilerplate while adding on the additional clarification 
>>> sentence.
>>
>>
>> We have not updated the document; please provide the new text.
>
> Proposed text:
>
> : Modules that use the groupings that are defined in this document
> : should identify the corresponding security considerations. For
> : example, reusing some of these groupings will expose privacy-related
> : information (e.g., 'node-example'). This module defines one such grouping,
> : "bfd-large-common", which contains the "pdu-size" data node whose security
> : considerations are documented above.
>
> The takes the boilerplate section you noted and appends the sentence that
> explains what, in this module, is applicable.
>
> ------
>
> One further comment, Albert points out that the two instances of "1500"
> In the text should be "1512" for consistency with the example earlier
> In the document.
>
> -- Jeff
>
>
> Juniper Business Use Only





-- 
auth48archive mailing list -- auth48archive@rfc-editor.org
To unsubscribe send an email to auth48archive-le...@rfc-editor.org

Reply via email to