Alice, > This diff file shows the changes made during AUTH48 thus far: > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9764-auth48diff.html__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!DulRqW5N_GWlzu33Fmtfm45VVwyWnf--B3I530cGoqDy5GC_m8mpNAUqw53KwGOTWAkA2hX2Fe29g63r7I_AK7Y$ > > <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9764-auth48diff.html__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!DulRqW5N_GWlzu33Fmtfm45VVwyWnf--B3I530cGoqDy5GC_m8mpNAUqw53KwGOTWAkA2hX2Fe29g63r7I_AK7Y$>
The interdiff here looks fine, thanks. > Re: 4) Section 4.5, where "The above text" refers to the entire section, per > your reply. This sentence has not been been updated. Please consider whether > it would be more precise as follows. > > Orig: The above text also applies to most, if not all, BFD techniques. > Perhaps: This section applies to most, if not all, BFD techniques. The perhaps text is fine. > Re: 7) Security Considerations, you replied: > > The deviation was intentional, but perhaps may be better served by > > preserving > > the original boilerplate while adding on the additional clarification > > sentence. > > > We have not updated the document; please provide the new text. Proposed text: : Modules that use the groupings that are defined in this document : should identify the corresponding security considerations. For : example, reusing some of these groupings will expose privacy-related : information (e.g., 'node-example'). This module defines one such grouping, : "bfd-large-common", which contains the "pdu-size" data node whose security : considerations are documented above. The takes the boilerplate section you noted and appends the sentence that explains what, in this module, is applicable. ------ One further comment, Albert points out that the two instances of "1500" In the text should be "1512" for consistency with the example earlier In the document. -- Jeff Juniper Business Use Only -- auth48archive mailing list -- auth48archive@rfc-editor.org To unsubscribe send an email to auth48archive-le...@rfc-editor.org
