Hi Tony, Thank you for your reply. We have noted your approval on the AUTH48 status page (see https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9696).
Once we receive approval from Dmitry, we will move this document forward in the publication process. Thank you, RFC Editor/mc > On Feb 6, 2025, at 3:31 AM, Antoni Przygienda <p...@juniper.net> wrote: > > I read it (finally) and mostly fine, observations that are all minor > > > * ZTP acronym expansion removed, I think in first instance it’s helpful, same > for ToF unless it’s introduced in the glossary > * it’s rather Key-Value than Key-value or key-value IME > * the pure default route, there is only one so probably the definite article > is superfluous * a “Multiple Plane_s_ Miscabling” > * “but the operational reasons to reach” , looks like “the” is superfluous > * > Please incorporate if they make sense or otherwise I’m ok with current > content > > Thanks > > — Tony -- auth48archive mailing list -- auth48archive@rfc-editor.org To unsubscribe send an email to auth48archive-le...@rfc-editor.org
