Hi Michael,

The proposal sounds good for me as well. I like the substructure, which makes 
it better readable. I only added a small comment in the PR. 

Best regards
Steffen

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Michael Richardson <mcr+i...@sandelman.ca>
> Sent: Monday, May 26, 2025 7:43 PM
> To: William Atwood <william.atw...@concordia.ca>
> Cc: Gorry Fairhurst <go...@erg.abdn.ac.uk>; The IESG <i...@ietf.org>; 
> draft-ietf-
> anima-brski-...@ietf.org; anima-cha...@ietf.org; anima@ietf.org;
> i...@kovatsch.net; t...@cs.fau.de
> Subject: Re: [Anima] Re: Gorry Fairhurst's No Objection on 
> draft-ietf-anima-brski-
> prm-22: (with COMMENT)
> 
> 
> William Atwood <william.atw...@concordia.ca> wrote:
>     >> Such a physically present attacker could learn the identity of the 
> Pledge by
> simply pretending to be a Registrar-Agent, and asking the device for it's 
> identity.
> 
>     > s/it's/its/
> 
> fixed.
> 
>     >> An active on-path attacker can not replace the signed objects that the
>     >> Pledge and Registrar-Agent exchange.
> 
>     > "can not" is ambiguous.  It can mean "it is impossible for the attacker 
> to
>     > replace the signed objects", or it can mean "it is possible for the 
> attacker
>     > to 'not replace' (i.e., leave as-is) the signed objects".
> 
>     > If the first meaning is what you intend, then you could s/can 
> not/cannot/,
>     > but you should probably reword as "It is impossible for an active 
> on-path
>     > attacker to replace the signed objects that the Pledge and 
> Registrar-Agent
>     > exchange."  If the second meaning is what you intend, then I suggest
>     > rewriting to express what is actually true.
> 
> I replaced the sentence as you suggest, and I extended to explain:
> 
>     > Also, it would be good to add a sentence explaining why (in either 
> case).
> 
> Now in https://github.com/anima-wg/anima-brski-prm/pull/151
> 
> --
> Michael Richardson <mcr+i...@sandelman.ca>   . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
>            Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide
> 
> 
> 

_______________________________________________
Anima mailing list -- anima@ietf.org
To unsubscribe send an email to anima-le...@ietf.org

Reply via email to