Gorry Fairhurst <go...@erg.abdn.ac.uk> wrote:
> OK. So, I am trying to work out what that sentence could read like if
> it were to help people understand what you explain. Could it be
> something like:
> /potentially no transport layer security between Registrar-Agent and
> pledge/use where there is no transport layer security between
> Registrar-Agent and pledge/
Is this for section 5.1, where it says:
* There is no trust assumption between the pledge and the Registrar-Agent
as only authenticated self-contained objects are used, which are
transported via the Registrar-Agent and provided either by the pledge or
the domain registrar.
or did you have another place that you'd put this?
> - this comment relates only to not seeing what is being said, not to a
> deeper problem.
> Best wishes,
> Gorry
> ----------------------------------------------------
> Alternatives:
> ----------------------------------------------------
--
Michael Richardson <mcr+i...@sandelman.ca> . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Anima mailing list -- anima@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to anima-le...@ietf.org
