On 9/3/24 17:40, Mischief via agora-discussion wrote: > On 9/3/24 3:03 PM, Kiako via agora-discussion wrote: >> On 9/3/24 7:28 AM, Mischief via agora-discussion wrote: >>> however, if a Power Grab specifies zero Stamps this fee is >>> automatically considered paid. >> Do fee-based actions not already consider 0-item fees trivially paid? > Not explicitly as far as I could see. (There's "Attempts to transfer no > assets are successful." in R2577, though.) I think the only way it can > currently come up is if a stone's cost manages to decrease all the way > to zero. You'd still have to specify the stone, so it doesn't make a > difference even then. > > My hope was that players wouldn't have to mention a zero fee at all, > since it's easily overlooked and a silly reason to have someone's plans > fail.
We've gone through several iterations of this, and yes that is the language (along with "Attempts to destroy no assets are successful") that is meant to make it work. -- Janet Cobb Assessor, Rulekeepor
