On Mon, Jun 1, 2020, 8:33 PM James Cook via agora-business < agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> On Sun, 31 May 2020 at 19:35, Kerim Aydin via agora-business > <agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote: > > On 5/31/2020 12:29 PM, nch via agora-business wrote: > > > On Sunday, May 31, 2020 2:06:51 PM CDT Kerim Aydin via agora-official > wrote: > > >> The below CFJ is 3837. I assign it to grok. > > >> > > >> status: https://faculty.washington.edu/kerim/nomic/cases/#3837 > > >> > > >> =============================== CFJ 3837 > =============================== > > >> > > >> Falsifian owns at least one blot if and only if English > Wikipedia > > >> has an article titled "Sponge". > > >> > > >> > ========================================================================== > > > > > > Gratuitous: This CFJ should be found FALSE because the rules do not > define a > > > biconditional relationship between these facts, regardless of whether > either > > > individual fact is TRUE or FALSE. > > > > > > > Gratuitous: A judgement of IRRELEVANT is also appropriate - to evaluate > > this, we are required to consider a world in which a common subject like > > "sponge" is not in Wikipedia. A world like this might be strange in > other > > ways. This is, literally and directly, an "overly hypothetical > > extrapolation of the game or its rules to conditions that don't actually > > exist" as defined for IRRELEVANT in R591. > > Gratuitous response: > > If you accept my previous argument, i.e. that my statement should be > interpreted in the classical logic way, then there's nothing > hypothetical in my statement. > > If you don't, then this seems like a good argument to me. > > - Falsifan > With current events I have been...distracted this week. I intend to submit my judgment on this CFJ today. -grok >
