On Sun, May 31, 2020 at 5:45 PM Kerim Aydin via agora-official
<agora-offic...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
>
>
> Sorry, I mixed up the message in Evidence with a similar one when pasting
> the case together.  The actual "Caller's Evidence" message is:
>
> On Sunday, May 31, 2020 2:30:56 PM CDT grok wrote:
> > On Sun, May 31, 2020, 2:29 PM nch wrote wrote:
> >> On Sunday, May 31, 2020 2:06:51 PM CDT Kerim Aydin wrote:
> >>> The below CFJ is 3837.  I assign it to grok.
> >>>
> >>> status: https://faculty.washington.edu/kerim/nomic/cases/#3837
> >>>
> >>> ===============================  CFJ 3837
> >>
> >> ===============================
> >>
> >>>       Falsifian owns at least one blot if and only if English Wikipedia
> >>>       has an article titled "Sponge".
> >>
> >> ==========================================================================
> >>
> >> Gratuitous: This CFJ should be found FALSE because the rules do not define
> >> a
> >> biconditional relationship between these facts, regardless of whether
> >> either
> >> individual fact is TRUE or FALSE.
> >>
> >> --
> >> nch
> >
> > I transfer 1 shiny to nch.
>
>
> On 5/31/2020 1:33 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> >
> > [Arbitor's note:  I'm linking this case to 3831 as it revolves around
> > very similar issues of translation of old terms to new, so it might be a
> > useful compare/contrast].
> >
> >
> > The below CFJ is 3838.  I assign it to Publius Scribonius Scholasticus.
> >
> > status: https://faculty.washington.edu/kerim/nomic/cases/#3838
> >
> > ===============================  CFJ 3838  ===============================
> >
> >       Grok transferred one coin to me in the above quoted message.
> >
> > ==========================================================================
> >
> > Caller:                        nch
> >
> > Judge:                         Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
> >
> > ==========================================================================
> >
> > History:
> >
> > Called by nch:                                    31 May 2020 20:04:05
> > Assigned to Publius Scribonius Scholasticus:      [now]
> >
> > ==========================================================================
> >
> > Caller's Evidence:
> >
> > On 5/31/2020 12:37 PM, grok wrote:
> >> On Sun, May 31, 2020, 2:35 PM Kerim Aydin wrote:
> >>> On 5/31/2020 12:29 PM, nch wrote:
> >>>> On Sunday, May 31, 2020 2:06:51 PM CDT Kerim Aydin wrote:
> >>>>> The below CFJ is 3837.  I assign it to grok.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> status: https://faculty.washington.edu/kerim/nomic/cases/#3837
> >>>>>
> >>>>> ===============================  CFJ 3837
> >>> ===============================
> >>>>>
> >>>>>       Falsifian owns at least one blot if and only if English Wikipedia
> >>>>>       has an article titled "Sponge".
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>> =====================================================================
> >>>>
> >>>> Gratuitous: This CFJ should be found FALSE because the rules do not
> >>> define a
> >>>> biconditional relationship between these facts, regardless of whether
> >>> either
> >>>> individual fact is TRUE or FALSE.
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> Gratuitous:  A judgement of IRRELEVANT is also appropriate - to evaluate
> >>> this, we are required to consider a world in which a common subject like
> >>> "sponge" is not in Wikipedia.  A world like this might be strange in other
> >>> ways.  This is, literally and directly, an "overly hypothetical
> >>> extrapolation of the game or its rules to conditions that don't actually
> >>> exist" as defined for IRRELEVANT in R591.
> >>>
> >>
> >> I transfer 1 shiny to g
> >>
> >
> >
> > Caller's Arguments:
> >
> > Shinies aren't an asset currently defined by rules or contracts. But they
> > served a similar purpose to coins in recent history. Additionally, I don't
> > see any other asset or action this could reasonably be interpreted as.
> > Thus, I think it's reasonable to interpret 'shiny' as a synonym for 'coins'.
> >
> > ==========================================================================
> >

I have my own thoughts on this case and will make an independent
judgement, but I would appreciate if the Honorable Treasuror could
provide any thoughts they have given that it pertains to switches e
tracks.
  • DIS: Re: OFF: Re: [Ar... Publius Scribonius Scholasticus via agora-discussion

Reply via email to