On Fri, May 22, 2020 at 8:53 PM Publius Scribonius Scholasticus <p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > On May 22, 2020, at 20:07, Edward Murphy via agora-discussion > > <agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote: > > > > PSS wrote: > > > >> If the Referee is the investigator and the Arbitor is not the > >> perpetrator, the Arbitor is the Judge. If the Arbitor is the > >> Investigator or the perpetrator, the Speaker is the Judge. > > > > Okay, so Rule 2478 includes this: > > > > The Referee is by default the investigator for all Finger > > Pointing. If the Referee is the perp, then the Arbitor CAN > > become the investigator of that Finger Pointing by announcement. > > > > so the other clause appears to cover all the > > Could you clarify which other clause? I’m not sure to what you’re referring. > > > bases (the investigator is > > either the Referee or the Arbitor), it's just confusing. What about: > > > > The Judge of an Indictment is the Arbitor, unless the Arbitor is > > the investigator or perp, in which case the Judge is the Speaker.
Thanks for this rephrasing! I've figured out what you meant and like your new version much better.
