PSS wrote:
If the Referee is the investigator and the Arbitor is not the
perpetrator, the Arbitor is the Judge. If the Arbitor is the
Investigator or the perpetrator, the Speaker is the Judge.
Okay, so Rule 2478 includes this:
The Referee is by default the investigator for all Finger
Pointing. If the Referee is the perp, then the Arbitor CAN
become the investigator of that Finger Pointing by announcement.
so the other clause appears to cover all the bases (the investigator is
either the Referee or the Arbitor), it's just confusing. What about:
The Judge of an Indictment is the Arbitor, unless the Arbitor is
the investigator or perp, in which case the Judge is the Speaker.
Also, are there any possible corner cases when one or more of the
offices changes holder after the Indictment is initiated? There's
definitely one where Arbitor and Speaker are the same player, though
at that point we might decide "okay, if you succeed in landing Speaker
then you're allowed to get away with that for the duration".
