On 5/21/2020 8:59 AM, Jason Cobb via agora-discussion wrote: > On 5/21/20 6:59 AM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus via agora-discussion > wrote: >> ---- >> For this >> decision, the vote collector is the Judge, the options are GUILTY, >> NOT GUILTY, REJECT, and PRESENT, and the voting method is AI- >> majority with AI=1.5. > > For an AI decision, the only options are FOR and AGAINST (see R2528). >
Yeah, can't have all options have a 1.5 threshold. You want GUILTY to be the equivalent of ADOPTED. How about just say an AI-1.5 decision with standard options, where an ADOPTED would result in the outcomes associated with GUILTY? Also realize, if you're going the Decision route, there's nothing currently stopping punishment proposals, and even if this rule is implemented there's nothing stopping someone from changing the AI threshold by doing this: "I submit the following proposal, AI-[whatever I like]: Whereas PSS is guilty of Treason, when this proposal takes effect 10 Blots are created in eir possession". -G.
