On Tuesday, May 19, 2020 5:07:51 PM CDT Publius Scribonius Scholasticus via agora-discussion wrote: > On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 5:56 PM nch via agora-discussion > > <agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote: > > On Tuesday, May 19, 2020 2:48:20 PM CDT you wrote: > > > I don't like this idea. The history of this provision is that I gave a > > > CFJ > > > judgement essentially establishing something like this. Everyone > > > (especially G.) thought it was a terrible idea, and they persuaded me. > > > CAN > > > has a very sensible default meaning currently, that allows us to do > > > things > > > like specifying a method in one place and enabling its use in another. > > > Also, the need to write out the by announcement makes you think about > > > whether that's actually what you want. But most of all, I just really > > > don't > > > like making this implicit, even if it's explicitly defined as being > > > implicit. > > > > What are the instances when it's useful to do something in a way besides > > announcement? > > We do it all the time: with notice, without objection, with support, > with Agoran Consent.
Those are all dependent actions, which are define as occurring by announcement (among the other conditions that make them distinct) in R2595. -- nch
