Re: DIS: Re: BUS: [Proposal] No More 'By Announcement'

[Publius Scribonius Scholasticus via agora-discussion]

On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 5:56 PM nch via agora-discussion
<agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
>
> On Tuesday, May 19, 2020 2:48:20 PM CDT you wrote:
> > I don't like this idea. The history of this provision is that I gave a CFJ
> > judgement essentially establishing something like this. Everyone
> > (especially G.) thought it was a terrible idea, and they persuaded me. CAN
> > has a very sensible default meaning currently, that allows us to do things
> > like specifying a method in one place and enabling its use in another.
> > Also, the need to write out the by announcement makes you think about
> > whether that's actually what you want. But most of all, I just really don't
> > like making this implicit, even if it's explicitly defined as being
> > implicit.
>
> What are the instances when it's useful to do something in a way besides
> announcement?
>
We do it all the time: with notice, without objection, with support,
with Agoran Consent.