On 5/12/2020 7:21 PM, Jason Cobb via agora-discussion wrote: > On 5/12/20 10:12 PM, James Cook via agora-discussion wrote: >> I'm happy to have others do it too, but there should be some >> coordination so we don't end up with two people working on summaries >> for the same week. (Maybe the Reportor contract could issue a unique >> asset for each week that determines who's responsible for, and >> entitled to the reward for, that week.) >> >> - Falsifian > > > Hmm... this brings up an interesting question. If we have publicly > funded contract, we probably don't want a few people being able to > change the contract by unanimous agreement.
I thought about this when writing, and was thinking that being able to de-charity a contract w/Agora consent, plus the coin decay, meant the worst case scenario was someone got a months-worth of coins (or 2 months worth with good timing, still not a huge heist) before it was defunded. But another option is for the Notary to make a policy of not making charities unless they had certain protective clauses e.g. "nobody consents to a change unless the notary also consents[1]" or suchlike. -G. [1] CFJs on the interpretation of Rule 2519.2 expected, bring em on.
