On Mon, 29 Oct 2018, D. Margaux wrote: > > On Oct 29, 2018, at 1:47 PM, Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu> wrote: > > > > This isn't a paradox though. The situation is resolved > > by calling a new CFJ. > > I suppose that’s a fair point. > > In that case, if Trigon judges FALSE, the CFJ i called earlier today would > determine which judgement prevails, I suppose based on your view of whether > the Round Robin CFJ should “actually” be TRUE or FALSE? I guess that works > to avoid any paradox. Oh well. Yah, to be clear I'll try to act more like an appellate judge and give v. strong deference to Trigon's opinion.
- DIS: Attn. Trigon (Re: BUS: CFJ 3672 reassigned and new ... Kerim Aydin
- Re: DIS: Attn. Trigon (Re: BUS: CFJ 3672 reassigned... D. Margaux
- Re: DIS: Attn. Trigon (Re: BUS: CFJ 3672 reassi... Kerim Aydin
- Re: DIS: Attn. Trigon (Re: BUS: CFJ 3672 re... D. Margaux
- Re: DIS: Attn. Trigon (Re: BUS: CFJ 367... Kerim Aydin
- Re: DIS: Attn. Trigon (Re: BUS: CFJ 3672 reassigned... Reuben Staley
- Re: DIS: Attn. Trigon (Re: BUS: CFJ 3672 reassi... D. Margaux
- Re: DIS: Attn. Trigon (Re: BUS: CFJ 3672 reassi... Aris Merchant
- Re: DIS: Attn. Trigon (Re: BUS: CFJ 3672 re... Timon Walshe-Grey
- Re: DIS: Attn. Trigon (Re: BUS: CFJ 3672 re... Kerim Aydin
- Re: DIS: Attn. Trigon (Re: BUS: CFJ 367... Aris Merchant