On Mon, 29 Oct 2018, D. Margaux wrote:
> > On Oct 29, 2018, at 1:47 PM, Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu> wrote:
> > 
> > This isn't a paradox though.  The situation is resolved
> > by calling a new CFJ.  
> 
> I suppose that’s a fair point. 
> 
> In that case, if Trigon judges FALSE, the CFJ i called earlier today would 
> determine which judgement prevails, I suppose based on your view of whether
> the Round Robin CFJ should “actually” be TRUE or FALSE? I guess that works
> to avoid any paradox. Oh well.

Yah, to be clear I'll try to act more like an appellate judge and give
v. strong deference to Trigon's opinion.


Reply via email to