> On Oct 29, 2018, at 1:47 PM, Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu> wrote:
> 
> This isn't a paradox though.  The situation is resolved
> by calling a new CFJ.  

I suppose that’s a fair point. 

In that case, if Trigon judges FALSE, the CFJ i called earlier today would 
determine which judgement prevails, I suppose based on your view of whether the 
Round Robin CFJ should “actually” be TRUE or FALSE? I guess that works to avoid 
any paradox. Oh well. 

Reply via email to