> On Oct 29, 2018, at 1:47 PM, Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu> wrote: > > This isn't a paradox though. The situation is resolved > by calling a new CFJ. I suppose that’s a fair point. In that case, if Trigon judges FALSE, the CFJ i called earlier today would determine which judgement prevails, I suppose based on your view of whether the Round Robin CFJ should “actually” be TRUE or FALSE? I guess that works to avoid any paradox. Oh well.
- DIS: Attn. Trigon (Re: BUS: CFJ 3672 reassigned and new ... Kerim Aydin
- Re: DIS: Attn. Trigon (Re: BUS: CFJ 3672 reassigned... D. Margaux
- Re: DIS: Attn. Trigon (Re: BUS: CFJ 3672 reassi... Kerim Aydin
- Re: DIS: Attn. Trigon (Re: BUS: CFJ 3672 re... D. Margaux
- Re: DIS: Attn. Trigon (Re: BUS: CFJ 367... Kerim Aydin
- Re: DIS: Attn. Trigon (Re: BUS: CFJ 3672 reassigned... Reuben Staley
- Re: DIS: Attn. Trigon (Re: BUS: CFJ 3672 reassi... D. Margaux
- Re: DIS: Attn. Trigon (Re: BUS: CFJ 3672 reassi... Aris Merchant
- Re: DIS: Attn. Trigon (Re: BUS: CFJ 3672 re... Timon Walshe-Grey
- Re: DIS: Attn. Trigon (Re: BUS: CFJ 3672 re... Kerim Aydin
- Re: DIS: Attn. Trigon (Re: BUS: CFJ 367... Aris Merchant