A contract is a document plus consent.

-Aris

On Sun, Sep 30, 2018 at 1:18 AM Cuddle Beam <cuddleb...@gmail.com> wrote:

> A document sure, but:
>
> A *contract*? That’s the issue.
>
> On Sun, 30 Sep 2018 at 10:17, Aris Merchant <
> thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > All they’ve done is agree to abide by a document. That wasn’t hidden. If
> > they do something based off that, then the probably will need to prove
> it,
> > at least to the judge.
> >
> > -Aris
> >
> > On Sun, Sep 30, 2018 at 1:15 AM Cuddle Beam <cuddleb...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > > About the evidence thing, wouldn’t the hidden-actions that G and DMar
> > need
> > > evidence as well that they have formally happened?
> > >
> > > Or, since there is no evidence, just like my own thing, it didn’t
> > actually
> > > happen? (Until its shown that it has, in which case reality suddenly
> > > changes to it like that newspaper in Back to the Future? Shröninger!)
> > >
> > > On Sun, 30 Sep 2018 at 10:07, Aris Merchant <
> > > thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Generally, I think we’d expect you to present evidence that you were
> > > right.
> > > > Also, welcome back CuddleBeam.
> > > >
> > > > H. Herald, we don’t appear to have ever made CuddleBeam a scampster.
> > This
> > > > is a grave oversight. I (informally, but I’ll make it formal after
> > Patent
> > > > Petitions have passed if I have to) petition that immediate action be
> > > taken
> > > > to rectify this situation.
> > > >
> > > > -Aris
> > > >
> > > > On Sat, Sep 29, 2018 at 11:15 PM Cuddle Beam <cuddleb...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > I’m curious about how CfJs and the gamestate would work with secret
> > > > > gamestate info like this.
> > > > >
> > > > > I become part of that contract.
> > > > >
> > > > > By virtue of that contract, I act on behalf of G. and D Margaux to
> > > > transfer
> > > > > all of their assets to myself.
> > > > >
> > > > > By virtue of that contract, I destroy that contract.
> > > > >
> > > > > Now, of course, what I’ve done could’ve been total bullshit but
> feel
> > > free
> > > > > to CfJ and present _evidence_ against what I’ve just done to prove
> me
> > > > > wrong.
> > > > >
> > > > > On Sun, 30 Sep 2018 at 01:12, Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I agree to the exchanged Contract with this hash.  -G.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Sat, 29 Sep 2018, D Margaux wrote:
> > > > > > > G. and I have exchanged a document that has text with the
> > following
> > > > > > SHA256
> > > > > > > hash:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> 58629980096A5E997EC5CF62C04B59EBFBEEAF81DD4785B50CCF190E1F24CE2D
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I agree to be bound by that text and I agree and consent for
> that
> > > > text
> > > > > to
> > > > > > > be a contract between me and G., if G. likewise agrees.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to