Looking at CFJ 1215, I believe this fails _even if the contract allows you to do that_, because I, the relevant recordkeepor, don't have the necessary information to determine what your action's effect would be.
That's why I revealed the text of my contract with Aris before using its provision for me to act on eir behalf. (That might have been unnecessary because I'm the relevant recordkeepor for that as well, but I'm not entirely clear whether CFJ 1215 requires all the necessary information to be public as well.) -twg ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ On Sunday, September 30, 2018 6:14 AM, Cuddle Beam <cuddleb...@gmail.com> wrote: > I’m curious about how CfJs and the gamestate would work with secret > gamestate info like this. > > I become part of that contract. > > By virtue of that contract, I act on behalf of G. and D Margaux to transfer > all of their assets to myself. > > By virtue of that contract, I destroy that contract. > > Now, of course, what I’ve done could’ve been total bullshit but feel free > to CfJ and present evidence against what I’ve just done to prove me wrong. > > On Sun, 30 Sep 2018 at 01:12, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote: > > > I agree to the exchanged Contract with this hash. -G. > > On Sat, 29 Sep 2018, D Margaux wrote: > > > > > G. and I have exchanged a document that has text with the following > > > SHA256 > > > hash: > > > 58629980096A5E997EC5CF62C04B59EBFBEEAF81DD4785B50CCF190E1F24CE2D > > > I agree to be bound by that text and I agree and consent for that text to > > > be a contract between me and G., if G. likewise agrees.
