On Sun, 2018-09-30 at 08:01 +0000, Timon Walshe-Grey wrote: > Looking at CFJ 1215, I believe this fails _even if the contract > allows you to do that_, because I, the relevant recordkeepor, don't > have the necessary information to determine what your action's effect > would be.
The recordkeeping rules have changed somewhat since then, though, so the precedent might no longer apply. If it does, it'd be interesting to see what happens if the recordkeepor is one of the players who's party to the contract. -- ais523
