About the evidence thing, wouldn’t the hidden-actions that G and DMar need evidence as well that they have formally happened?
Or, since there is no evidence, just like my own thing, it didn’t actually happen? (Until its shown that it has, in which case reality suddenly changes to it like that newspaper in Back to the Future? Shröninger!) On Sun, 30 Sep 2018 at 10:07, Aris Merchant < thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote: > Generally, I think we’d expect you to present evidence that you were right. > Also, welcome back CuddleBeam. > > H. Herald, we don’t appear to have ever made CuddleBeam a scampster. This > is a grave oversight. I (informally, but I’ll make it formal after Patent > Petitions have passed if I have to) petition that immediate action be taken > to rectify this situation. > > -Aris > > On Sat, Sep 29, 2018 at 11:15 PM Cuddle Beam <cuddleb...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > I’m curious about how CfJs and the gamestate would work with secret > > gamestate info like this. > > > > I become part of that contract. > > > > By virtue of that contract, I act on behalf of G. and D Margaux to > transfer > > all of their assets to myself. > > > > By virtue of that contract, I destroy that contract. > > > > Now, of course, what I’ve done could’ve been total bullshit but feel free > > to CfJ and present _evidence_ against what I’ve just done to prove me > > wrong. > > > > On Sun, 30 Sep 2018 at 01:12, Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu> > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > I agree to the exchanged Contract with this hash. -G. > > > > > > On Sat, 29 Sep 2018, D Margaux wrote: > > > > G. and I have exchanged a document that has text with the following > > > SHA256 > > > > hash: > > > > > > > > 58629980096A5E997EC5CF62C04B59EBFBEEAF81DD4785B50CCF190E1F24CE2D > > > > > > > > I agree to be bound by that text and I agree and consent for that > text > > to > > > > be a contract between me and G., if G. likewise agrees. > > > > > > > > > > > > >
