Oops, you're right. You know, it seems pretty likely that those ones just never began in the first place.
-Aris On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 1:38 PM, Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu> wrote: > > > These are independent auctions so only the incorrect ones were just > terminated I think? (Auctions 1,3,4). > > On Thu, 12 Apr 2018, Aris Merchant wrote: >> I agree with G.'s interpretation. I believe that Rule 2549's statement >> that "An Auction also CANNOT be initiated unless the Auctioneer is >> able to give away each item in each of the Auction's lots" is >> applicable, given that the announced items do not in fact exist. Just >> in case, I terminate the ongoing land auction, because some of the >> lots are nonexistent and therefore "the Auctioneer of that Auction >> cannot transfer any item included in a lot in that Auction" (Rule >> 2552). >> >> -Aris >> >> On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 11:10 AM, Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu> wrote: >> > >> > >> > My interpretation: >> > >> > You describe a particular lot as a "white land unit at XXXX". You do not >> > have >> > a "white land unit at XXXX" to transfer, so anyone can terminate the >> > auction. >> > If no one terminates it, I'm not sure whether you can satisfy your >> > obligation >> > to transfer by transferring a black land unit at XXXX, or not. >> > >> > (oh, just out of curiosity where does it say you CAN transfer particular >> > land units? That wording of that would play into what you can or cannot >> > satisfy). >> > >> > On Thu, 12 Apr 2018, Reuben Staley wrote: >> >> I'd say that these data are less relevant than the coordinates of the land >> >> units, so it would not invalidate it. But that may just be me but wanting >> >> to do work to fix it. >> >> >> >> On Thu, Apr 12, 2018, 11:24 Corona <liliumalbum.ag...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >> >> > Wait, I just looked it up (in your own report) and: >> >> > >> >> > AUCTION 1: The lot is the white land unit at (+1, +2) <-- actually black >> >> > AUCTION 2: The lot is the white land unit at (+1, +3) >> >> > AUCTION 3: The lot is the white land unit at (+2, 0) <-- actually black >> >> > AUCTION 4: The lot is the black land unit at (+2, +1) <-- actually white >> >> > AUCTION 5: The lot is the black land unit at (+2, +2) >> >> > >> >> > Gasp! It cannot be! Is it a... SCAM?!?! >> >> > >> >> > More seriously, does it make the auction initiation invalid? >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 8:30 AM, Reuben Staley <reuben.sta...@gmail.com> >> >> > wrote: >> >> > >> >> > > This is the second real land auction. >> >> > > >> >> > > There are currently 5 public, unpreserved, non-aether land units in >> >> > > existence. All 5 are put up for auction. >> >> > > >> >> > > For the following 5 auctions, I am the announcer, Agora is the >> >> > auctioneer, >> >> > > and the minimum bid is 1 coin: >> >> > > >> >> > > AUCTION 1: The lot is the white land unit at (+1, +2) >> >> > > AUCTION 2: The lot is the white land unit at (+1, +3) >> >> > > AUCTION 3: The lot is the white land unit at (+2, 0) >> >> > > AUCTION 4: The lot is the black land unit at (+2, +1) >> >> > > AUCTION 5: The lot is the black land unit at (+2, +2) >> >> > > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > -- >> >> > >> >> > ~Corona >> >> > >> >> >> >
