>AGAINST. By my read, this would change the restriction > 6. The voter has no other valid ballots on the same decision.
>to > 6. The voter has no other invalid ballots on the same decision. >which is obvious nonsense. DARN. Knew I should have bribed you again. Alright show's over boys vote against this proposal. On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 4:11 PM, Owen Jacobson <o...@grimoire.ca> wrote: > I vote as follows: > >> ID Author(s) AI Title Pender Pend >> fee >> --------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> 7973* Aris 1.0 Sky Pillars Aris OP [1] > > AGAINST. A permanent monument to every departed player is a cute idea, but > probably impractical. > > Besides, it should be the Herald, not the Registrar. > >> 7974* V.J. Rada 3.0 [2] Really minor fixes V.J. Rada 1 AP > > AGAINST. By my read, this would change the restriction > > 6. The voter has no other valid ballots on the same decision. > > to > > 6. The voter has no other invalid ballots on the same decision. > > which is obvious nonsense. > > The portion amending Agoran Satisfaction should also be a bit more thorough; > that list of clauses is a mess. > > Sorry for the late review. I had initially thought this proposal was much > less substantial than it actually is. There are a number of worthwhile and > important fixes in it; I’ll likely resubmit it as several separate proposals > to help get the changes to the less-risky rules through. > >> 7975* ATMunn, [3] 2.0 Auctions v6 ATMunn 1 AP > > FOR. > >> 7976* Alexis, [4] 1.7 A Mostest Ingenious Paradox Alexis 2 sh. > > PRESENT. > >> 7977* ATMunn 3.0 Silver Ribbons ATMunn 1 AP > > FOR, why not. > >> 7978* G. 3.0 Gotta allow a win sometime Corona 1 AP > > FOR. Pegging the already-high difficulty of a ribbon win is a reasonable idea. > >> 7979* G. 1.0 Plain Old Bribery G. 1 AP > > FOR, to the surprise of absolutely nobody. > >> 7980* ATMunn, [5] 1.0 [6] Alexis 1 AP > > FOR. > > -o > -- >From V.J. Rada
