Sorry, coffee hadn't hit yet. Took me embarrassing ages to spot the actual error, so I kept thinking "why did e replace a wrong number with the same wrong number?"
On Sun, 19 Nov 2017, Kerim Aydin wrote: > I identify the lack of clarity in the distribution announcement as to the > matters being decided, as the proposal numbers are unclear for > voting and record keeping (for r107). > > On Sun, 19 Nov 2017, Aris Merchant wrote: > > > I CoE my assignment of numbers to the below proposals, and assign the > > ones shown below in their place as a revision. The previous numbers > > were taken. > > > > 7979* G. 1.0 Plain Old Bribery G. 1 AP > > 7980* ATMunn, [5] 1.0 [6] Alexis 1 AP
