Thankfully the expedition only needs to back to last year, when the ruleset was ratified.
On Sun, Nov 19, 2017, 20:40 VJ Rada, <vijar...@gmail.com> wrote: > I'm simply taking the current ruleset as authoritative and realizing that > nobody's exactly going on a decade-old digging expedition to fix the typos. > You're right, I could have phrased a bit better. But the worst that happens > is that, when the rulekeepor miraculously checks all typos in my fixes, a > couple of minor typos are added. It's still better to vote for it. > > On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 12:26 PM, Ørjan Johansen <oer...@nvg.ntnu.no> > wrote: > > > On Sun, 19 Nov 2017, Alexis Hunt wrote: > > > > 7974* V.J. Rada 3.0 [2] Really minor fixes V.J. Rada 1 > AP > >>> > >>> FOR. Note that some of these may be Rulekeepor typos; I will do my best > >> to > >> investigate and determine which ones are. > >> > > > > Some of the changes are equivalent to "replace text A with some text > > containing A", so if any of those are actually Rulekeepor typos, the > > proposal would end up duplicating stuff that wasn't really missing. > > > > In particular, most of the period additions. Some of the plural > > corrections might count as well if quoted text is allowed to end inside a > > word. > > > > Greetings, > > Ørjan. > > > > > > -- > From V.J. Rada >
