I'm simply taking the current ruleset as authoritative and realizing that nobody's exactly going on a decade-old digging expedition to fix the typos. You're right, I could have phrased a bit better. But the worst that happens is that, when the rulekeepor miraculously checks all typos in my fixes, a couple of minor typos are added. It's still better to vote for it.
On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 12:26 PM, Ørjan Johansen <oer...@nvg.ntnu.no> wrote: > On Sun, 19 Nov 2017, Alexis Hunt wrote: > > 7974* V.J. Rada 3.0 [2] Really minor fixes V.J. Rada 1 AP >>> >>> FOR. Note that some of these may be Rulekeepor typos; I will do my best >> to >> investigate and determine which ones are. >> > > Some of the changes are equivalent to "replace text A with some text > containing A", so if any of those are actually Rulekeepor typos, the > proposal would end up duplicating stuff that wasn't really missing. > > In particular, most of the period additions. Some of the plural > corrections might count as well if quoted text is allowed to end inside a > word. > > Greetings, > Ørjan. > -- >From V.J. Rada
