On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 7:51 AM, Kerim Aydin <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Tue, 14 Nov 2017, ATMunn wrote: >> The only problem I see with this right off the bat is that G. has already >> made >> a draft proposal dealing with land in a different way (see DIS: SimAgora >> 2000). These two proposals would probably > > Yes I agree we should do one or the other not both. I don't mind which > really, but as per my earlier comments I'd want to see more purpose and > goals on this one first.
If this one were used (and I at least am leaning in favor of it at the moment), do you have any ideas that went into yours that might be good additions here? -Aris
