On 2017-11-03 11:55, Alexis Hunt wrote:
On Thu, 2 Nov 2017 at 20:53 Madeline <j...@iinet.net.au <mailto:j...@iinet.net.au>> wrote:The real trouble might just be stopping people from stocking up a huge amount of favours before doing anything, but I'm not entirely sure there isn't a counter to this (a tax on them might be the best, destroying some small percentage of unused favours each week to effectively implement a soft cap)Yeah, that's probably a good idea. We can probably block that by separate proposal long before it becomes a problem though.Also getting the Economic Favours is kind of stupid, but so is everything else with the economy right now and it certainly fits the theme.Yeah. Part of the intent there is to provide an exit in case we repeal shinies and go with a different economy; I think this proposal isn't quite ready to be a full economy on its own, but it might be tweakable to one. If we do, we could replace economic policy with something else and have everyone dump their shinies into it before it's gone.
Yeah, I was thinking "they wouldn't be gathering balloons and everyone could dump theirs into a proposal to just wreck the favours of a hoarder" but then I know some people would vote against that kind of thing by principle (yay morals in a game!) and the end result would probably just be creating a tax to do it for them anyway.
