Oh. Then it's PSS' responsibility now and not mine? -- Trigon
On Oct 22, 2017 8:40 AM, "Alexis Hunt" <aler...@gmail.com> wrote: That was only an intent; you haven't actually done it yet. On Sun, 22 Oct 2017 at 10:34 Reuben Staley <reuben.sta...@gmail.com> wrote: > Are people still not getting my messages? It's in a thread with the title > "Deputising for the rulekeepor". > > -- > Trigon > > On Oct 22, 2017 8:31 AM, "Alexis Hunt" <aler...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Huh? When? >> >> On Sun, Oct 22, 2017, 10:26 Reuben Staley, <reuben.sta...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> I don't think it's possible, as I have already deputized for rulekeepor. >>> >>> -- >>> Trigon >>> >>> On Oct 22, 2017 5:42 AM, "Publius Scribonius Scholasticus" < >>> p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> I pledge to deputize for the rulekeepor on October 19, 2017, if it is >>> still possible. >>> >>> >>> On 10/22/2017 12:14 AM, Alexis Hunt wrote: >>> > Huh, you're right, I could have sworn I saw them there... >>> > >>> > Rulekeepor is definitely out of date on SLRs; anyone could deputise >>> > for it with appropriate notice. They could also start an election, >>> > perhaps with a campaign pledge to reinstate CFJ annotations? >>> > >>> > On Sun, 22 Oct 2017 at 00:13 Madeline <j...@iinet.net.au >>> > <mailto:j...@iinet.net.au>> wrote: >>> > >>> > I mean... I had noticed :P and the ADoP office itself being in >>> > confusion >>> > is really troubling... >>> > >>> > >>> > On 2017-10-22 15:10, VJ Rada wrote: >>> > > The FLR hasn't had them in a long time: certainly not since I've >>> > been >>> > > a player. I think Gaelan took them out. >>> > > >>> > > JDGA: I'm ironically not sure what you can deputize for because >>> I'm >>> > > late on my ADoP report (and am no longer ADoP) but I think it >>> > might be >>> > > just rulekeepor? o hasn't posted in about a week (I've kind of >>> > missed >>> > > him already haha) so it seems likely that he might miss this >>> week's >>> > > report but it would take another week for you to deputize. >>> > Rulekeepor >>> > > I think you can next week but not this week (or next month >>> because >>> > > Gaelan updated the FLR last month but forgot to file it as a >>> > report). >>> > > I think every other office is OK? >>> > > >>> > > And regarding the uploading: I certainly haven't uploaded my >>> > weeklies >>> > > to the website and nobody's really noticed. I think none of them >>> are >>> > > really in date rip. Except, obviously, uploading the ruleset is >>> > > important. >>> > > >>> > > On Sun, Oct 22, 2017 at 3:05 PM, Alexis Hunt <aler...@gmail.com >>> > <mailto:aler...@gmail.com>> wrote: >>> > >> On Sat, 21 Oct 2017 at 23:54 VJ Rada <vijar...@gmail.com >>> > <mailto:vijar...@gmail.com>> wrote: >>> > >>> We really need to bring back rule annotations for important >>> CFJs. >>> > >> >>> > >> The FLR has them, although I do not know if Gaelan has been >>> > keeping them up >>> > >> to date. >>> > >> >>> > >> https://faculty.washington.edu/kerim/nomic/cases/?2909 is the >>> > original >>> > >> precedent that I'm aware of (fun fact: "Wooble is a player" may >>> > be the >>> > >> single most common CFJ text of all time). >>> > > >>> > > >>> > >>> >>> >>> >>>
