Huh, you're right, I could have sworn I saw them there... Rulekeepor is definitely out of date on SLRs; anyone could deputise for it with appropriate notice. They could also start an election, perhaps with a campaign pledge to reinstate CFJ annotations?
On Sun, 22 Oct 2017 at 00:13 Madeline <j...@iinet.net.au> wrote: > I mean... I had noticed :P and the ADoP office itself being in confusion > is really troubling... > > > On 2017-10-22 15:10, VJ Rada wrote: > > The FLR hasn't had them in a long time: certainly not since I've been > > a player. I think Gaelan took them out. > > > > JDGA: I'm ironically not sure what you can deputize for because I'm > > late on my ADoP report (and am no longer ADoP) but I think it might be > > just rulekeepor? o hasn't posted in about a week (I've kind of missed > > him already haha) so it seems likely that he might miss this week's > > report but it would take another week for you to deputize. Rulekeepor > > I think you can next week but not this week (or next month because > > Gaelan updated the FLR last month but forgot to file it as a report). > > I think every other office is OK? > > > > And regarding the uploading: I certainly haven't uploaded my weeklies > > to the website and nobody's really noticed. I think none of them are > > really in date rip. Except, obviously, uploading the ruleset is > > important. > > > > On Sun, Oct 22, 2017 at 3:05 PM, Alexis Hunt <aler...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On Sat, 21 Oct 2017 at 23:54 VJ Rada <vijar...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>> We really need to bring back rule annotations for important CFJs. > >> > >> The FLR has them, although I do not know if Gaelan has been keeping > them up > >> to date. > >> > >> https://faculty.washington.edu/kerim/nomic/cases/?2909 is the original > >> precedent that I'm aware of (fun fact: "Wooble is a player" may be the > >> single most common CFJ text of all time). > > > > > >
