I don't think it's possible, as I have already deputized for rulekeepor.

--
Trigon

On Oct 22, 2017 5:42 AM, "Publius Scribonius Scholasticus" <
p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com> wrote:

I pledge to deputize for the rulekeepor on October 19, 2017, if it is
still possible.


On 10/22/2017 12:14 AM, Alexis Hunt wrote:
> Huh, you're right, I could have sworn I saw them there...
>
> Rulekeepor is definitely out of date on SLRs; anyone could deputise
> for it with appropriate notice. They could also start an election,
> perhaps with a campaign pledge to reinstate CFJ annotations?
>
> On Sun, 22 Oct 2017 at 00:13 Madeline <j...@iinet.net.au
> <mailto:j...@iinet.net.au>> wrote:
>
>     I mean... I had noticed :P and the ADoP office itself being in
>     confusion
>     is really troubling...
>
>
>     On 2017-10-22 15:10, VJ Rada wrote:
>     > The FLR hasn't had them in a long time: certainly not since I've
>     been
>     > a player. I think Gaelan took them out.
>     >
>     > JDGA: I'm ironically not sure what you can deputize for because I'm
>     > late on my ADoP report (and am no longer ADoP) but I think it
>     might be
>     > just rulekeepor? o hasn't posted in about a week (I've kind of
>     missed
>     > him already haha) so it seems likely that he might miss this week's
>     > report but it would take another week for you to deputize.
>     Rulekeepor
>     > I think you can next week but not this week (or next month because
>     > Gaelan updated the FLR last month but forgot to file it as a
>     report).
>     > I think every other office is OK?
>     >
>     > And regarding the uploading: I certainly haven't uploaded my
>     weeklies
>     > to the website and nobody's really noticed. I think none of them are
>     > really in date rip. Except, obviously, uploading the ruleset is
>     > important.
>     >
>     > On Sun, Oct 22, 2017 at 3:05 PM, Alexis Hunt <aler...@gmail.com
>     <mailto:aler...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>     >> On Sat, 21 Oct 2017 at 23:54 VJ Rada <vijar...@gmail.com
>     <mailto:vijar...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>     >>> We really need to bring back rule annotations for important CFJs.
>     >>
>     >> The FLR has them, although I do not know if Gaelan has been
>     keeping them up
>     >> to date.
>     >>
>     >> https://faculty.washington.edu/kerim/nomic/cases/?2909 is the
>     original
>     >> precedent that I'm aware of (fun fact: "Wooble is a player" may
>     be the
>     >> single most common CFJ text of all time).
>     >
>     >
>

Reply via email to