Yes, regardless of who deputizes in the short-term I think this one definitely deserves an election.
On Sun, 22 Oct 2017, Alexis Hunt wrote: > > I agree. I'm considering putting myself up for election on it as a result. > > On Sun, Oct 22, 2017, 15:20 Kerim Aydin, <ke...@u.washington.edu> wrote: > > > I should say I'm a bit nervous with someone who hasn't been an Officer > before starting with rulekeepor. It's an unholy blend of a lot of work, > in big bursts, with timeliness being a big issue, and it requires some > pretty finicky understanding of the rules (e.g. it's the primary person > responsible for whether proposal amendments work, requiring knowledge of > standards for clarity, AI/power, etc.) I think the position is > historically the biggest source of officer burn-out even among > experienced players. (I think almost *all* rulekeepor changeovers have > happened when the rulekeepor just gave up on it for a month or more).
