I was waiting because I noticed days later and I hoped nobody else did. Fun fact: Only one of the Decisions I've initiated was ever valid. Obviously ratified now but I can't seem to get all four conditions lmao. Only one person (Alexis) ever noticed, and e didn't this time.
I now have a "checklist" google doc I plan to consult, if ADoP again haha. On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 9:18 AM, Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu> wrote: > > > On Mon, 16 Oct 2017, VJ Rada wrote: >> >By the rules of the time, the Decision was initiated correctly. >> >> THIS IS NOT TRUE. By the rules of the time, they were initiated >> wrongly. By the UNAMENDED rules of today (Initiating Agoran Decisions, >> rule 107), not changed at all by new proposals) they were still wrong. >> I am taking a quibble with form UNRELATED to the new proposal. There's >> a reason every election initation before me inclued "and the valid >> options are PRESENT and the players" or something like it) >> >> Please retract your CFJ. > > Oh, I see - absolutely, reading too quickly. I withdraw my CFJ. > > You were waiting to see if you were winning, weren't you :P. > > (But we're still stuck in getting things going...) > > > -- >From V.J. Rada
