On Mon, 16 Oct 2017, VJ Rada wrote: > The rules now also provide no way for the ADoP to resolve such an > Agoran decision, but the election's initiation stated that the ADoP > was the resolver. I guess the election would sort of dissolve in thin > air if this interpretation was taken.
It would be pretty funny if it could never be resolved, but a new one could never be started because the present one is "in progress".
