Actually, retroactively replacing an Officeholder is ugly. Better version:
The following document is ratified: { [winner] has just now won an election for Prime Minister. [winner] has just now won an election for ADoP. } On Sun, 15 Oct 2017, Kerim Aydin wrote: > Proto ratification statement (this can also be in a proposal): > > The following document is ratified: > { > On Mon Oct 15 03:18:27 UTC, [winner] won an election for Prime Minister. > On Mon Oct 15 03:18:27 UTC, [winner] won an election for ADoP. > } > > > The current (new) rule reads: > When a player wins an election, e is installed into the associated > office and the election ends. > So asserting that someone "won an election" at a certain time installs em > with the right status and ends the election. > > > >