On Mon, 16 Oct 2017, VJ Rada wrote:
> I now, to a-b, officially "identify" the lack of options noted in my 
> initiation.
> 
> The ELECTIONS were still initiated (one by G. and one by me) but the
> DECISIONS were not.

Anyway, if you're right, I think we're worse-off now then if you'd let the
Decision initiation self-ratify.

1.  The election was initiated.

2.  We're not in the nomination period, because it didn't start when the
     election was initiated.

3.  You CANNOT start a Decision until after the nomination period ends.

4.  So the Decision can't be started, ever, but the election is ongoing.

(if we'd let the start self-ratify, or if I'm right that it's started anyway,
we be able to get out of that).



Reply via email to