On Mon, 16 Oct 2017, VJ Rada wrote: > I now, to a-b, officially "identify" the lack of options noted in my > initiation. > > The ELECTIONS were still initiated (one by G. and one by me) but the > DECISIONS were not. Anyway, if you're right, I think we're worse-off now then if you'd let the Decision initiation self-ratify. 1. The election was initiated. 2. We're not in the nomination period, because it didn't start when the election was initiated. 3. You CANNOT start a Decision until after the nomination period ends. 4. So the Decision can't be started, ever, but the election is ongoing. (if we'd let the start self-ratify, or if I'm right that it's started anyway, we be able to get out of that).
- Re: BUS: Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Assessor] Resolution of Proposals ... VJ Rada
- Re: BUS: Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Assessor] Resolution of Proposals ... Kerim Aydin
- Re: BUS: Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Assessor] Resolution of Proposals ... VJ Rada
- Re: BUS: Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Assessor] Resolution of Proposals ... Kerim Aydin
- Re: BUS: Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Assessor] Resolution of Proposals ... VJ Rada
- Re: BUS: Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Assessor] Resolution of Propo... Kerim Aydin
- Re: BUS: Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Assessor] Resolution of P... Kerim Aydin
- Re: BUS: Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Assessor] Resolution ... Alexis Hunt
- Re: BUS: Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Assessor] Resolut... Kerim Aydin
- Re: BUS: Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Assessor] Re... VJ Rada
- DIS: election end discussion Kerim Aydin
- DIS: Re: election end discussion Kerim Aydin
- Re: DIS: Re: election end discussion Alexis Hunt
- Re: BUS: Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Assessor... ATMunn .