I'm sure the referee realizes that the timely fashion response will stretch into next week's supply of cards. (And if ever there was a case for Pink Slip, it's this one).
On Thu, 28 Sep 2017, VJ Rada wrote: > " A person SHALL NOT make a public statement that is a lie. A statment is a > lie > if its publisher either knew or believed it to be not to be true at the time > e published it (or, in the case of an action, not to be effective), and it > was made with the intent to mislead. Merely quoting a statement does not > constitute making it for the purposes of this rule." > > Whoops. This attempt was certainly illegal. Although, unless the card > issued to nichdel didn't work, there's nothing the referee can do > about it. > > On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 12:20 AM, Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu> wrote: > > > > > > I ... thought I did? On mobile now, but planning to catch up with all the > > tasks later today and will check. > > > > There are "bad" judgements that were never appealed or were forced > > through similarly, and the result was an immediate follow up CFJ saying > > the earlier one was wrong and overriding the precedent. > > > > There might be some interesting end play and discussion about forcing > > officers to disobey rules, but in the end CFJs are only guidelines. > > > > > > On Thu, 28 Sep 2017, VJ Rada wrote: > >> My plan would be to use some combination of my two PM votes, grok's > >> habit of voting with gFP, Celestial Fire-Fox's agency and ridiculously > >> high quorums to try and strongarm it, even though I'm sure others > >> would simply ignore me. > >> > >> Talking of moots, have you ever resolved that moot on the CFJ I judged? > >> > >> On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 12:09 AM, Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu> > >> wrote: > >> > > >> > > >> > I did wonder if it was something like that :p > >> > > >> > (If one does turn up truly unjudged I would try to get it resolved). > >> > > >> > Also: even if you judge on your win, you're just fast-tracking it for > >> > moot, there's really no endgame where a wrong CFJ stands and > >> > becomes precedent AFAICT. > >> > > >> > In the past when there's been an obvious bad faith judge, a parallel > >> > CFJ is just called in the mean time and everyone ignores the bad one > >> > pretty much. > >> > > >> > On Thu, 28 Sep 2017, VJ Rada wrote: > >> >> Sorry yeah, my plan was p much to get people to call CFJs on my > >> >> frivolous win attempt thinking they were safe and then tricking them > >> >> by revealing this was invalid and I still had certiorari. > >> >> > >> >> On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 11:54 PM, Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu> > >> >> wrote: > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > Follow up, 3110 was judged by Murphy 24 Oct 2011. > >> >> > > >> >> > On Wed, 27 Sep 2017, Kerim Aydin wrote: > >> >> >> Please please do not do this without asking. There are a ream of > >> >> >> court cases that have been judged but were not put in the official > >> >> >> Court online records. I have been catching up about 10 a month on > >> >> >> the > >> >> >> back end from my email archive and updated about 50 so far. > >> >> >> In doing so, of those 50 I only found 1 wit hough a judgement. > >> >> >> I'm happy to do the research when you pick one, but before you > >> >> >> grab it. > >> >> >> > >> >> >> On Wed, 27 Sep 2017, VJ Rada wrote: > >> >> >> > I found heaps of CFJs that seem to be never judged. I plan to use > >> >> >> > Certiorari to judge them all like a boss. The first one is 3110, I > >> >> >> > use > >> >> >> > Certiorari to assign it to myself. > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > The statement of the CFJ is this: > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > I (Pavitra) satisfy the Victory Condition of Being Pavitra, by > >> >> >> > means > >> >> >> > of sending this message. > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > My judgement is UNDETERMINED. See 3111 and 3109, > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > -- > >> >> >> > From V.J. Rada > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> -- > >> >> From V.J. Rada > >> >> > >> > > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> From V.J. Rada > >> > > > > > > -- > From V.J. Rada >
