I never used a power of the office. If I actually used certiorari to judge my own CFJ, that would be a different story.
On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 12:59 AM, Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu> wrote: > > > I'm sure the referee realizes that the timely fashion response will stretch > into > next week's supply of cards. (And if ever there was a case for Pink Slip, > it's this one). > > On Thu, 28 Sep 2017, VJ Rada wrote: >> " A person SHALL NOT make a public statement that is a lie. A statment is a >> lie >> if its publisher either knew or believed it to be not to be true at the >> time >> e published it (or, in the case of an action, not to be effective), and it >> was made with the intent to mislead. Merely quoting a statement does not >> constitute making it for the purposes of this rule." >> >> Whoops. This attempt was certainly illegal. Although, unless the card >> issued to nichdel didn't work, there's nothing the referee can do >> about it. >> >> On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 12:20 AM, Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu> wrote: >> > >> > >> > I ... thought I did? On mobile now, but planning to catch up with all the >> > tasks later today and will check. >> > >> > There are "bad" judgements that were never appealed or were forced >> > through similarly, and the result was an immediate follow up CFJ saying >> > the earlier one was wrong and overriding the precedent. >> > >> > There might be some interesting end play and discussion about forcing >> > officers to disobey rules, but in the end CFJs are only guidelines. >> > >> > >> > On Thu, 28 Sep 2017, VJ Rada wrote: >> >> My plan would be to use some combination of my two PM votes, grok's >> >> habit of voting with gFP, Celestial Fire-Fox's agency and ridiculously >> >> high quorums to try and strongarm it, even though I'm sure others >> >> would simply ignore me. >> >> >> >> Talking of moots, have you ever resolved that moot on the CFJ I judged? >> >> >> >> On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 12:09 AM, Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu> >> >> wrote: >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > I did wonder if it was something like that :p >> >> > >> >> > (If one does turn up truly unjudged I would try to get it resolved). >> >> > >> >> > Also: even if you judge on your win, you're just fast-tracking it for >> >> > moot, there's really no endgame where a wrong CFJ stands and >> >> > becomes precedent AFAICT. >> >> > >> >> > In the past when there's been an obvious bad faith judge, a parallel >> >> > CFJ is just called in the mean time and everyone ignores the bad one >> >> > pretty much. >> >> > >> >> > On Thu, 28 Sep 2017, VJ Rada wrote: >> >> >> Sorry yeah, my plan was p much to get people to call CFJs on my >> >> >> frivolous win attempt thinking they were safe and then tricking them >> >> >> by revealing this was invalid and I still had certiorari. >> >> >> >> >> >> On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 11:54 PM, Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu> >> >> >> wrote: >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > Follow up, 3110 was judged by Murphy 24 Oct 2011. >> >> >> > >> >> >> > On Wed, 27 Sep 2017, Kerim Aydin wrote: >> >> >> >> Please please do not do this without asking. There are a ream of >> >> >> >> court cases that have been judged but were not put in the official >> >> >> >> Court online records. I have been catching up about 10 a month on >> >> >> >> the >> >> >> >> back end from my email archive and updated about 50 so far. >> >> >> >> In doing so, of those 50 I only found 1 wit hough a judgement. >> >> >> >> I'm happy to do the research when you pick one, but before you >> >> >> >> grab it. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On Wed, 27 Sep 2017, VJ Rada wrote: >> >> >> >> > I found heaps of CFJs that seem to be never judged. I plan to use >> >> >> >> > Certiorari to judge them all like a boss. The first one is 3110, >> >> >> >> > I use >> >> >> >> > Certiorari to assign it to myself. >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> > The statement of the CFJ is this: >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> > I (Pavitra) satisfy the Victory Condition of Being Pavitra, >> >> >> >> > by means >> >> >> >> > of sending this message. >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> > My judgement is UNDETERMINED. See 3111 and 3109, >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> > -- >> >> >> >> > From V.J. Rada >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> >> From V.J. Rada >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> From V.J. Rada >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> -- >> From V.J. Rada >> > -- >From V.J. Rada
