I did wonder if it was something like that :p
(If one does turn up truly unjudged I would try to get it resolved). Also: even if you judge on your win, you're just fast-tracking it for moot, there's really no endgame where a wrong CFJ stands and becomes precedent AFAICT. In the past when there's been an obvious bad faith judge, a parallel CFJ is just called in the mean time and everyone ignores the bad one pretty much. On Thu, 28 Sep 2017, VJ Rada wrote: > Sorry yeah, my plan was p much to get people to call CFJs on my > frivolous win attempt thinking they were safe and then tricking them > by revealing this was invalid and I still had certiorari. > > On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 11:54 PM, Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu> wrote: > > > > > > Follow up, 3110 was judged by Murphy 24 Oct 2011. > > > > On Wed, 27 Sep 2017, Kerim Aydin wrote: > >> Please please do not do this without asking. There are a ream of > >> court cases that have been judged but were not put in the official > >> Court online records. I have been catching up about 10 a month on the > >> back end from my email archive and updated about 50 so far. > >> In doing so, of those 50 I only found 1 wit hough a judgement. > >> I'm happy to do the research when you pick one, but before you > >> grab it. > >> > >> On Wed, 27 Sep 2017, VJ Rada wrote: > >> > I found heaps of CFJs that seem to be never judged. I plan to use > >> > Certiorari to judge them all like a boss. The first one is 3110, I use > >> > Certiorari to assign it to myself. > >> > > >> > The statement of the CFJ is this: > >> > > >> > I (Pavitra) satisfy the Victory Condition of Being Pavitra, by means > >> > of sending this message. > >> > > >> > My judgement is UNDETERMINED. See 3111 and 3109, > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > -- > >> > From V.J. Rada > >> > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > -- > From V.J. Rada >
