On Sun, Sep 24, 2017 at 4:53 PM, Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu> wrote: > > > On Sun, 24 Sep 2017, Reuben Staley wrote: >> So, basically, karma is a kind of informal punishment/reward system based on >> transfers that >> anybody can access and change without objection? Depending on how much this >> is used for >> in the future, I can see way too many instances where this is exploited >> purely to attack >> one or more people. > > Very good points. It's definitely an interesting social experiment. Until we > see how this stabilizes of its own accord, I won't propose attaching it to any > other part of the gamestate (e.g. won't make it a losing condition as I just > suggested in the other proto, or have any penalty). > > -G.
Agreed. I'm going to vote FOR, on the basis that for now it will be a prestige thing, like most of the stuff in the Herald's report. -Aris
